Free sampler. Re-scored every six months.
Content and campaign execution scores 8.2 out of 10 for AI exposure, where 10 is most at risk — among the highest scores in this index. Brand strategy and marketing leadership scores 5.5. Marketing has no licensing protection, no physical requirement, and no structural moat of any kind. Every bit of protection in this field has to be earned, and all of it sits at the senior end.
The short answer for parents: not on its own. A general marketing degree pointed at a content or campaign execution job is one of the weakest combinations we score. The versions that work pair marketing with genuine analytical depth, with a specific industry, or point explicitly at commercial leadership.
Every career in this index is scored 1–10, where 10 is most exposed to AI. Same six factors, same weights, applied identically to a marketer and a paramedic.
| Marketing track | 2023 | 2025 | Now | 3-yr move | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand strategy / marketing leadership | 4.7 | 5.0 | 5.5 | +0.8 | Moderate |
| Marketing science / analytics | 5.4 | 5.8 | 6.2 | +0.8 | Mod–High |
| Product marketing | 5.6 | 6.0 | 6.5 | +0.9 | Mod–High |
| Campaign management | 6.2 | 6.8 | 7.2 | +1.0 | High |
| Content & social execution | 6.5 | 7.6 | 8.2 | +1.7 | High |
2023 and 2025 figures are reconstructed using current methodology, not archived from past editions.
For scalethe median career in this edition scores around 5.5. A business analyst scores 7.6. Entry-level software development scores 8.1. Bedside nursing scores 2.8.
Content execution moved +1.7 in three years — third-fastest in the entire index. And it started from an already elevated base.
It has already replaced most of what a junior marketer was hired to do.
The distinction that matters is between producing marketing and deciding marketing. Generating content is no longer a job — it is a prompt. Deciding what should exist, and being accountable for whether it worked, still is.
How content and campaign execution rates against each. Ratings are 0–10 on each factor's own terms.
So you can see what the analysis actually looks like.
Does the law require a licensed human? — rated 1.0
Most of our worked examples explain why a career is protected. Marketing is worth examining for the opposite reason: it is the clearest case in this index of a profession with no structural protection at all, and understanding what that means is more useful than another example of a strong score.
Two of our six factors are effectively zero for everyone in marketing, at every level of seniority:
Regulatory protection: 1.0. There is no license. No professional body controls entry, no statute reserves any marketing activity to a qualified human, and nothing prevents any organization from replacing marketing work with software the moment the software is adequate. Compare accounting, where the audit signature is a legal monopoly, or nursing, where scope-of-practice rules and staffing ratios are written into law.
Physical requirement: 1.0. All of it can be done from anywhere, which means all of it can be done by anything.
Those two zeros are permanent and they apply to the CMO as much as to the intern. Nothing anyone does changes them.
So marketing's entire protection budget has to come from the remaining factors — trust, judgment and accountability — and all three are seniority-dependent. A brand director rates 7.0 on trust because clients and boards want a human answerable for the strategy. A content executive rates 3.0 because nobody is trusting them with anything.
That is why the gap between the top and bottom of this profession is 2.7 points, and why the bottom is the highest score in the business family.
The general lesson: look at what a profession has at zero. Careers with structural protections have a floor beneath them, however junior. Careers without one have only whatever the individual has personally earned — and a graduate has not earned anything yet.
Ranked by exposure, safest first:
Only in specific forms, and the general version is the problem.
A broad marketing degree aimed at a content or campaign job is what a large share of marketing students are actually enrolled in, and it is the combination our scoring likes least — high automatability, severe entry-path erosion, and no structural protection to slow either down.
The versions that hold up:
The portfolio question matters more here than in any other field we score: can the graduate demonstrate judgment and results, rather than volume of content? Content volume is now free. Judgment is not.
Worth asking any program directly: what did last year's graduates get hired to do, and what were they doing three years later?
This sampler tells you where marketing stands. The full profile tells you what to do about it.
Most families are weighing two or three careers seriously, and a few more they haven’t ruled out. Pick the ones you need.
Each includes a short version written directly to the student and the technical scoring appendix. Spring 2027 updates of whatever you buy are included.
Read one complete profile free → We publish computer science in full so you can judge the depth before buying anything.